Teresa J. Budzyn v. Citibank (South Dakota), N.A.
Teresa J. Budzyn v. Citibank (South Dakota), N.A.
Opinion
Opinion issued October 20, 2011.
In The
Court of Appeals
For The
First District of Texas
————————————
NO. 01-08-00211-CV
———————————
TERESA J. BUDZYN, Appellant
V.
CITIBANK (SOUTH DAKOTA), N.A., Appellee
On Appeal from the County Civil Court at Law No. 3
Harris County, Texas
Trial Court Cause No. 834504
MEMORANDUM OPINION
We dismiss this appeal for want of prosecution. On May 19, 2010, we abated this case because appellant, who was a defendant in the trial court, filed a suggestion of bankruptcy. On June 27, 2011, we advised the parties that the Court had learned from the bankruptcy court’s information service that the bankruptcy case was ordered closed on May 18, 2010 and that, unless a party to the appeal filed a motion to retain by July 18, 2011, the appeal would be reinstated and dismissed for want of prosecution. A motion to retain has not been filed.
Accordingly, we reinstate the appeal on our active docket, and we dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(b), (c).
PER CURIAM
Panel consists of Chief Justice Radack and Justices Bland and Huddle.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.