Ex Parte Patrick Harasmisz
Opinion
MEMORANDUM OPINION
No. 04-11-00745-CV
EX PARTE Patrick HARASMISZ
Original Habeas Corpus Proceeding 1 PER CURIAM
Sitting: Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice
Phylis J. Speedlin, Justice
Steven C. Hilbig, Justice
Delivered and Filed: October 26, 2011
PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS DENIED AS MOOT
On October 12, 2011, relator filed a petition for writ of habeas corpus, complaining Sheriff Amadeo Ortiz has failed to give him “good time” credit during his 180 day confinement after being held in contempt for failure to pay child support. However, on October 13, 2011 relator was released pursuant to a conditional release order signed by the trial court. The purpose of a habeas corpus proceeding is to ascertain whether the relator has been unlawfully confined. Ex parte Gordon, 584 S.W.2d 686, 688 (Tex. 1979); In re Alexander, 243 S.W.3d 822, 827 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 2007, orig. proceeding). Because relator is no longer confined, we have determined this petition is now moot. Accordingly, relator’s petition for writ of habeas corpus is DENIED AS MOOT.
PER CURIAM
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.