in Re Ronnie Wayne Jackson
in Re Ronnie Wayne Jackson
Opinion
Opinion issued August 4, 2011.
In The
Court of Appeals
For The
First District of Texas
————————————
NO. 01-11-00420-CR
NO. 01-11-00421-CR
NO. 01-11-00422-CR
NO. 01-11-00423-CR
NO. 01-11-00542-CR
NO. 01-11-00543-CR
———————————
in re Ronnie wayne jackson, Relator
Original Proceeding on Petition for Writ of Mandamus
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Relator Ronnie Wayne Jackson has filed two pro se petitions for writ of mandamus. In his first petition, relator complains that the trial court refuses to rule on his post-conviction application for writ of habeas corpus.[1] In his second petition, relator complains that the trial court has not given him all of the jail-time credit to which he is entitled.[2]
We deny both petitions for writ of mandamus.
Sherry Radack
Chief Justice
Panel consists of Chief Justice Radack and Justices Sharp and Brown.
Justice Sharp, concurring.
Do not publish. Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b).
[1] Relator’s first petition arises from a number of underlying cases in which he alleges he filed post-conviction applications for writ of habeas corpus, including cause numbers 098983801010A, 099257501010A, 124949001010A, and 125000101010A in the 263rd District Court of Harris County, the Honorable Jim Wallace presiding.
[2] Relator’s second petition challenges the calculation of jail-time credit in cause numbers 124949001010 and 125000101010 only.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.