MEMORANDUM OPINION No. 04-11-00317-CR IN RE Richard A. MORRIS Original Mandamus Proceeding 1 PER CURIAM Sitting: Karen Angelini, Justice Phylis J. Speedlin, Justice Steven C. Hilbig, Justice Delivered and Filed: May 25, 2011 PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS DENIED On May 3, 2011, relator Richard A. Morris filed a petition for writ of mandamus, complaining of the trial court’s failure to rule on various pro se motions. However, counsel has been appointed to represent relator in the criminal proceeding pending in the trial court for which he is currently confined. A criminal defendant is not entitled to hybrid representation. See Robinson v. State, 240 S.W.3d 919, 922 (Tex. Crim. App. 2007); Patrick v. State, 906 S.W.2d 481, 498 (Tex. Crim. App. 1995). A trial court has no legal duty to rule on pro se motions or petitions filed with regard to a criminal proceeding in which the defendant is represented by counsel. See Robinson, 240 S.W.3d at 922. Consequently, the trial court did not abuse its

This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 2010-CR-11681, styled State of Texas v. Richard A. Morris, pending in the 290th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas, the Honorable Melisa Skinner presiding.

04-11-00317-CR

discretion by declining to rule on relator’s pro se motion filed in the criminal proceeding pending in the trial court. Accordingly, the petition for writ of mandamus is denied. TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a).

PER CURIAM DO NOT PUBLISH

-2-