in the Interest of J.A v. a Child

MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04-10-00814-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF J.A.V., a Child

From the 57th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 2009-EM5-03867

Honorable Jim Rausch, Judge Presiding PER CURIAM

Sitting: Karen Angelini, Justice

Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice

Phylis J. Speedlin, Justice

Delivered and Filed: May 11, 2011

DISMISSED FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION

The trial court signed a final judgment, an Order Establishing the Parent-Child Relationship, on February 10, 2010. Because appellant did not file a motion for new trial, motion to modify the judgment, motion for reinstatement, or request for findings of fact and conclusions of law, the notice of appeal was due to be filed on March 12, 2010. See TEX. R. APP. P. 26.1(a). Appellant did not file his notice of appeal until November 12, 2010. 1 A motion for extension of time is necessarily implied when an appellant, acting in good faith, files a notice of appeal beyond the time allowed by Rule 26.1 but within the fifteen-day grace period provided by Rule 26.3 for filing a motion for extension of time. See Verburgt v.

Dorner, 959 S.W.2d 615, 617 (Tex. 1997) (construing the predecessor to Rule 26). But “once the period for granting a motion for extension of time under Rule [26.3] has passed, a party can no longer invoke the appellate court=s jurisdiction.” Id. As it appeared we lacked jurisdiction over this appeal, we ordered appellant to show cause why this appeal should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. Appellant did not respond. Thus, this appeal is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.

PER CURIAM