Sondra L. Grohman - Kahlig v. Clarence J. Kahlig, II
Opinion
MEMORANDUM OPINION
No. 04-07-00468-CV
Sondra L. GROHMAN-KAHLIG,
Appellant v.
Clarence J. KAHLIG, II, Appellee
From the 131st Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 2005-CI-13102 Honorable John D. Gabriel, Jr., Judge Presiding PER CURIAM
Sitting: Alma L. López, Retired Chief Justice 1
Phylis J. Speedlin, Justice
Rebecca Simmons, Justice
Delivered and Filed: February 16, 2011
DISMISSED
This appeal is on remand from the Texas Supreme Court. The sole issue remaining in the appeal on remand is “whether [appellee] is entitled to attorney’s fees.” Grohman v. Kahlig, 318 S.W.3d 882, 889 (Tex. 2010). Appellee filed a motion to dismiss the appeal stating, “The parties have reached an agreement with respect to the attorney’s fees that were awarded in the trial court’s judgment.” Appellant’s attorney filed an advisory in response to the motion, stating that he had been unable to reach appellant and requesting additional time to respond. Appellant’s attorney stated, “It is anticipated that the undersigned will speak with [appellant] by no later than January 21, 2011.” This court granted appellant an extension of time to file a response and ordered the response to be filed by January 28, 2011. No response has been filed, and appellant’s attorney has verbally informed the court that he has been unable to speak with his client. Based on the representations made by appellee in his motion, the motion to dismiss is granted, and this appeal is dismissed.
PER CURIAM
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.