Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, 2012

Prince v. AMERICAN BANK OF TEXAS

Prince v. AMERICAN BANK OF TEXAS
Court of Civil Appeals of Texas · Decided April 24, 2012 · Morris, Moseley, Myers
365 S.W.3d 852; 2012 WL 1418151; 2012 Tex. App. LEXIS 3181 (South Western Reporter, Third Series)

Prince v. AMERICAN BANK OF TEXAS

Opinion

OPINION

Opinion by

Justice MORRIS.

By opinion issued February 7, 2012, we denied Clovis Prince’s motion challenging the trial court’s order sustaining American Bank of Texas’s contest to his affidavit of indigence and ordered him to pay, or make arrangements to pay, for the record within twenty days of the date of the opinion. See Prince v. Am. Bank of Tex., 359 S.W.3d 380 (Tex.App.-Dallas 2012, no pet. h.). We cautioned Prince that failure to pay for the reporter’s record would result in this appeal being submitted without that record; failure to pay for the clerk’s record would result in dismissal of this appeal without further warning. See id. at 381; see also Tex.R.App. P. 37.3(b), (c), 42.3(b),(c). Prince timely filed a motion to reconsider our opinion, but we denied the motion by order issued March 15, 2012.

By letter dated March 20, 2012, we directed Prince to pay, or make arrangements to pay, for the record within fifteen days of the date of our letter. We further directed him to file written verification of his compliance within twenty days of the date of the letter. We cautioned him again that failure to pay for the reporter’s record would result in the appeal being submitted without that record and failure to pay for the clerk’s record would result in dismissal of the appeal without further warning. To date, Prince has not com *853 plied. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal. See id. 37.3(b), 42.3(b), (c).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.