Court of Appeals of Texas, 2012

John Stritzinger v. Katherine Wright

Court of Appeals of Texas · Decided May 24, 2012

Opinion

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-11-00581-CV

John Stritzinger, Appellant v.

Katherine Wright, Appellee

FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY, 345TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT NO. D-1-FM-04-004690, HONORABLE STEPHEN YELENOSKY, JUDGE PRESIDING

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellant John Stritzinger filed a pro se notice of appeal from the district court’s final order in a suit affecting the parent-child relationship. Stritzinger later filed an affidavit of indigence, and appellee Katherine Wright filed a contest to the affidavit. Stritzinger then filed a motion to dismiss his appeal, conditioned upon him not being able to proceed without payment of costs. We abated the appeal and referred the contest to the district court for an evidentiary hearing on appellant’s claim of indigence. See Tex. R. App. P. 20.1(h)(4).

Following the hearing, at which Stritzinger did not appear, the district court sustained the contest.1 Accordingly, in order to proceed with his appeal, Stritzinger is required to pay appellate costs. On May 8, 2012, the district clerk’s office notified this Court that payment for the clerk’s record had not been received as of that date. Moreover, we have received no communication from Stritzinger regarding the status of his appeal or indicating that he wishes to withdraw his previously filed motion to dismiss. We therefore grant Stritzinger’s motion to the extent of dismissing his appeal as requested.2

The appeal is dismissed.3

__________________________________________ Bob Pemberton, Justice Before Chief Justice Jones, Justices Pemberton and Rose

Dismissed on Appellant’s Motion

Filed: May 24, 2012

1 No motion challenging the district court’s order sustaining the contest has been filed. See Tex. R. App. P. 20.1(j)(1) (“If the trial court sustains a contest, the party claiming indigence may seek review of the court’s order by filing a motion challenging the order with the appellate court without advance payment of costs.”), (2) (“The motion must be filed within 10 days after the order sustaining the contest is signed, or within 10 days after the notice of appeal is filed, whichever is later.”). 2 Any other relief requested in the motion is denied, including Stritzinger’s request that the “cause be sealed.” 3 Prior to filing his motion to dismiss, Stritzinger also filed a motion to consolidate the record in this cause with the records in the prior causes he has filed in this Court. See, e.g., Stritzinger v. Wright, No. 03-10-00455-CV, 2011 Tex. App. LEXIS 1427 (Tex. App.—Austin Feb. 23, 2011, pet. denied) (mem. op.); Stritzinger v. Wright, No. 03-10-00651-CV, 2010 Tex. App. LEXIS 10028 (Tex. App.—Austin Dec. 15, 2010, no pet.) (mem. op.); Stritzinger v. Wright, No. 03-10-00458-CV, 2010 Tex. App. LEXIS 10016 (Tex. App.—Austin Dec. 15, 2010, no pet.) (mem. op.); Stritzinger v. Wright, Nos. 03-10-00235-CV, 03-10-00455-CV, 03-10-00456-CV, 03-10-00457-CV and 03-10-00458-CV (Tex. App.—Austin Sept. 29, 2010, no pet.) (mem. op.) (consolidating certain causes and dismissing others). In light of our dismissal of this cause, we dismiss the motion to consolidate as moot.

Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.