Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, 2012

Ernest Eugene Oveal v. State

Ernest Eugene Oveal v. State
Court of Civil Appeals of Texas · Decided August 23, 2012

Ernest Eugene Oveal v. State

Opinion

Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed August 23, 2012.

In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-12-00567-CR ERNEST EUGENE OVEAL, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 182nd District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 1292902

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellant entered a plea of no contest to injury to a child. Appellant and the State agreed that appellant’s punishment would not exceed confinement in prison for more than forty-five (45) years. In accordance with the terms of this agreement with the State, the trial court sentenced appellant on June 14, 2012, to confinement for forty-five (45) years in the Institutional Division of the Texas Department of Criminal Justice. Appellant filed a timely, written notice of appeal. We dismiss the appeal.

An agreement that places a cap on punishment is a plea bargain for purposes of Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 25.2(a)(2). Waters v. State, 124 S.W.3d 825, 826–27 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 2003, pet. ref=d); see also Shankle v. State, 119 S.W.3d 808, 813 (Tex. Crim. App. 2003) (stating sentence-bargaining may be for recommendations to the court on sentences, including a recommended “cap” on sentencing). Because appellant’s plea was made pursuant to a plea bargain, he may appeal only matters raised by a written pre-trial motion or with the trial court’s permission. See Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(a)(2). The record does not contain any pre-trial rulings.

The trial court entered a certification of the defendant’s right to appeal in which the court certified that this is a plea bargain case, and the defendant has no right of appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(a)(2). The trial court’s certification is included in the record on appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(d). The record supports the trial court’s certification. See Dears v. State, 154 S.W.3d 610, 615 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005).

Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Chief Justice Hedges and Justices Seymore and Brown.

Do Not Publish — Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.