Affirmed and Memorandum Opinion filed May 22, 2012.

In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals ____________ NO. 14-12-00257-CV ____________ IN THE INTEREST OF A.F., J.F., AND L.F., children

On Appeal from the 314th District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2011-01433J

MEMORANDUM OPINION Appellant, J.F., appeals a final decree signed February 22, 2012, terminating her parental rights to the children who are the subject of this suit. Appellant filed a timely notice of appeal.

Appellant’s appointed counsel filed a brief in which he concludes the appeal is wholly frivolous and without merit. The brief meets the requirements of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396 (1967), presenting a professional evaluation of the record demonstrating why there are no arguable grounds to be advanced. See High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807 (Tex. Crim. App. 1978). The Anders procedures are applicable to an appeal from the termination of parental rights when an appointed attorney concludes that there are no non-frivolous issues to assert on appeal. In re D.E.S., 135 S.W.3d 326, (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 2004, no pet.).

A copy of counsel’s brief and a copy of the record were delivered to appellant.

Appellant was advised of her right to examine the appellate record and file a pro se response. See Stafford v. State, 813 S.W.2d 503, 510 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991); In re D.E.S., 135 S.W.3d at 329-30. More than 30 days have elapsed and as of this date, no pro se response has been filed.

We have carefully reviewed the record and counsel’s brief and agree the appeal is wholly frivolous and without merit. Further, we find no reversible error in the record. A discussion of the brief would add nothing to the jurisprudence of the state.

Accordingly, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

/s/ Jeffrey V. Brown Justice

Panel consists of Chief Justice Hedges and Justices Seymore and Brown.