Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, 2012

Manley Dewayne Johnson v. State

Manley Dewayne Johnson v. State
Court of Civil Appeals of Texas · Decided April 19, 2012

Manley Dewayne Johnson v. State

Opinion

Motion Denied and Order filed April 19, 2012.

In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals ____________ NO. 14-11-00693-CR ____________ MANLEY DEWAYNE JOHNSON, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 230th District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 1283867

ORDER The clerk’s record in this appeal was filed September 19, 2011. On February 14, 2011, appellant filed a motion to supplement the clerk's record with an official bill of costs.

The motion was granted the and the Harris County District Clerk was directed to file a supplemental clerk's record containing an official bill of costs. In the order this court instructed that if the omitted item was not part of the case file, the district clerk was to file a supplemental clerk’s record containing a certified statement that the omitted item was not a part of the case file. In response, Naomi T. Salinas of the Harris County District Clerk's office filed an affidavit averring the official bill of costs is not part of the case file.

Appellant has filed a second motion, requesting this court to order the Harris County District Clerk to supplement the record with “whatever documents are necessary to inform [appellant] about his court costs.” Because the district clerk's office already has informed this court that the record in the trial court does not contain a bill of costs, the motion is denied. We note that pursuant to Texas Code of Criminal Procedure art. 103.001, “[a] cost is not payable by the person charged with the cost until a written bill is produced or is ready to be produced, containing the items of cost, signed by the officer who charged the cost or the officer who is entitled to receive payment for the cost.” See also Armstrong v. State, 340 S.W.3d 759, 767 (Tex. Crim. App. 2011) (a claim of insufficient evidence to support the assessment of court costs was a criminal law matter that should have been addressed by the court on appeal from the judgment of conviction).

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Frost, Brown, and Christopher.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.