Anthony Denard Mayo v. State
Opinion
In The Court of Appeals
Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont
_________________ NO. 09-12-00359-CR _________________
ANTHONY DENARD MAYO, Appellant
V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
________________________________________________________________________
On Appeal from the 252nd District Court
Jefferson County, Texas Trial Cause No. 06-99019
________________________________________________________________________
ORDER
On November 30, 2012, appellant’s appointed counsel filed a motion to withdraw and a brief which urges this Court to review this appeal pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). See In re Schulman, 252 S.W.3d 403, 408-09 (Tex. Crim. App. 2008). Counsel certified service of the motion to withdraw and the brief on the appellant. Counsel states that he provided appellant with a copy of the reporter’s record and notified appellant of his right to review the record and file a pro se brief.
It is, therefore, ORDERED that appellant, Anthony Denard Mayo, be given 60 days from the date hereof to file a pro se brief. It is, further, ORDERED that the State may file a reply brief, due 30 days from the date appellant files his brief, or if no brief is filed by appellant, 70 days from the date hereof.
It is further ORDERED that counsel for appellant advise appellant of his right to seek discretionary review under Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 68. See Tex. R. App. P. 48.4; see also Tex. R. App. P. 68.
ORDER ENTERED December 6, 2012.
PER CURIAM Before McKeithen, C.J., Gaultney and Horton, JJ.
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.