In The Court of Appeals Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont ____________________ NO. 09-12-00269-CR ____________________ ANDREW EUGENE BRAZIL, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee _______________________________________________________ ______________ On Appeal from the 252nd District Court Jefferson County, Texas Trial Cause No. 11-11966 ________________________________________________________ _____________ MEMORANDUM OPINION Andrew Eugene Brazil pleaded guilty under a plea agreement to burglary of a habitation. The trial court deferred adjudication of guilt and placed him on unadjudicated community supervision for seven years. After the State filed a motion to revoke, the trial court found Brazil violated terms of the community supervision, adjudicated his guilt, and sentenced him to twenty years of confinement.

Brazil’s appellate counsel filed a brief that presents counsel’s professional evaluation of the record. Counsel concludes there are no arguable points of error. See Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967); High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807 (Tex. Crim. App. 1978). This Court granted an extension of time for appellant to file a pro se response. We received no response from the appellant. We have reviewed the appellate record and agree with counsel’s conclusion. It is unnecessary to order appointment of new counsel to re-brief the appeal. Compare Stafford v. State, 813 S.W.2d 503, 511 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991). The trial court’s judgment is affirmed.

AFFIRMED.

________________________________ DAVID GAULTNEY Justice Submitted on November 14, 2012 Opinion Delivered November 28, 2012 Do Not Publish Before Gaultney, Kreger, and Horton, JJ.