Joseph Andrew Winters v. State
Opinion
In The
Court of Appeals
Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana _________________________
No. 06-12-00015-CR ______________________________
JOSEPH ANDREW WINTERS, Appellant
V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
On Appeal from the 3rd Judicial District Court
Anderson County, Texas
Trial Court No. 29876
Before Morriss, C.J., Carter and Moseley, JJ.
Memorandum Opinion by Justice Carter MEMORANDUM OPINION
Joseph Andrew Winters appeals the judgment adjudicating guilt for the offense of burglary of a building, a state jail felony. See TEX. PENAL CODE ANN. § 30.02(c)(1) (West 2011). Winters pled “true” to each allegation of the State’s motion to adjudicate, with the exception of the first paragraph. The trial court found each allegation in the State’s motion to be true, and sentenced Winters to two years’ confinement in a state jail facility. In addition, Winters was fined $2,500.00 and ordered to pay restitution to the victim of his crime in the amount of $1,500.00. Winters was represented by different appointed counsel at trial and on appeal.1
Winters’ attorney on appeal has filed a brief which discusses the record and reviews the proceedings in detail. Counsel has thus provided a professional evaluation of the record demonstrating why, in effect, there are no arguable grounds to be advanced. This meets the requirements of Anders v. California, 360 U.S. 738 (1967); Stafford v. State, 813 S.W.2d 503 (Tex. Crim. App. 1981); and High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807 (Tex. Crim. App. [Panel Op.] 1978).
Counsel mailed a copy of the brief to Winters on April 19, 2012, informing Winters of his right to file a pro se response and of his right to review the record. Counsel has also filed a motion with this Court seeking to withdraw as counsel in this appeal. Winters has neither filed a pro se response, nor has he requested an extension of time in which to file such a response.
We have determined that this appeal is wholly frivolous. We have independently reviewed the clerk’s record and the reporter’s record, and we agree that no arguable issues support an appeal. See Bledsoe v. State, 178 S.W.3d 824, 826–27 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005).
In a frivolous appeal situation, we are to determine whether the appeal is without merit and is frivolous, and if so, the appeal must be dismissed or affirmed. See Anders, 386 U.S. 738.
We affirm the judgment of the trial court.2
Jack Carter Justice Date Submitted: June 27, 2012
Date Decided: June 28, 2012
Do Not Publish
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.