Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, 2012

Tiffiney Cottledge v. James Roberson, D/B/A Roberson`s Remodeling and Roofing

Tiffiney Cottledge v. James Roberson, D/B/A Roberson`s Remodeling and Roofing
Court of Civil Appeals of Texas · Decided January 5, 2012

Tiffiney Cottledge v. James Roberson, D/B/A Roberson`s Remodeling and Roofing

Opinion

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

                                                         In The

                                                Court of Appeals

                        Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana

 

                                                ______________________________

 

                                                             No. 06-11-00111-CV

                                                ______________________________

 

 

                                    TIFFINEY COTTLEDGE, Appellant

 

                                                                V.

 

               JAMES ROBERSON, D/B/A ROBERSON’S REMODELING

                                            AND ROOFING, Appellee

 

 

                                                                                                  

 

 

                                       On Appeal from the 134th Judicial District Court

                                                             Dallas County, Texas

                                                          Trial Court No. 10-13682

 

                                                                                                   

 

 

 

                                          Before Morriss, C.J., Carter and Moseley, JJ.

                                        Memorandum Opinion by Chief Justice Morriss


                                                      MEMORANDUM OPINION

 

            Tiffiney Cottledge, appellant, filed her notice of appeal[1] July 28, 2011.

 

            Cottledge is not indigent.  Therefore, Cottledge is responsible for payment of the clerk’s record, reporter’s record, and filing fee.  See Tex. R. App. P. app. C (B)(1); 20.1. 

            The clerk’s record was due on or before November 8, 2011.  There is no information to indicate Cottledge has made efforts to have the clerk’s record filed with this Court.  Further, Cottledge has not paid the filing fee.  On December 8, 2011, we contacted Cottledge by letter, giving her an opportunity to cure the various defects, and warning her that, if we did not receive an adequate response within ten days, this appeal would be subject to dismissal for want of prosecution.  See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(b), (c).

            We have received no communication from Cottledge.  Pursuant to Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(b), we dismiss this appeal for want of prosecution.

 

 

                                                                        Josh R. Morriss, III

                                                                        Chief Justice

 

Date Submitted:          January 4, 2012          

Date Decided:             January 5, 2012



[1]Originally appealed to the Fifth Court of Appeals, this case was transferred to this Court by the Texas Supreme Court pursuant to its docket equalization efforts.  See Tex. Gov’t Code Ann. § 73.001 (West 2005).  We are unaware of any conflict between precedent of the Twelfth Court of Appeals and that of this Court on any relevant issue.  See Tex. R. App. P. 41.3.

 

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.