Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
Court of Appeals of Texas, 2012

in Re Paul D. Andrews, Keith M. Gould, the Gould Law Firm, and Andrews & Gould

in Re Paul D. Andrews, Keith M. Gould, the Gould Law Firm, and Andrews & Gould
Court of Appeals of Texas · Decided December 28, 2012
in Re Paul D. Andrews, Keith M. Gould, the Gould Law Firm, and Andrews & Gould

Opinion

NUMBER 13-12-00784-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

IN RE PAUL D. ANDREWS, KEITH M. GOULD,

THE GOULD LAW FIRM AND ANDREWS & GOULD

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Rodriguez and Perkes Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion1

Relators, Paul D. Andrews, Keith M. Gould, The Gould Law Firm, and Andrews & Gould, filed a petition for writ of mandamus and an emergency motion for stay in the above cause on December 28, 2012. The Court, having examined and fully considered the petition for writ of mandamus and the emergency motion for stay, is of the opinion that relators have not shown themselves entitled to the relief sought. Accordingly, the petition for writ of mandamus and the emergency motion for stay are DENIED. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a).

PER CURIAM Delivered and filed the 28th day of December, 2012.

1 See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(d) (“When denying relief, the court may hand down an opinion but is not required to do so.”); TEX. R. APP. P. 47.4 (distinguishing opinions and memorandum opinions).

Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.