in Re Julius Stewart
in Re Julius Stewart
Opinion
IN THE TENTH COURT OF APPEALS
No. 10-11-00472-CR IN RE JULIUS STEWART
Original Proceeding
MEMORANDUM OPINION
The application (petition) for writ of mandamus is denied.1
REX D. DAVIS Justice Before Chief Justice Gray, Justice Davis, and Justice Scoggins Petition denied Opinion delivered and filed January 11, 2012 Do not publish [OT06] The application has numerous procedural deficiencies. It lacks all of the requirements of Rule of Appellate Procedure 52.3 and, other than citation references to judicial recusal and disqualification, fails to inform the Court of the nature of the proceeding and the identity of the parties. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.3.
It lacks a record. See id. 52.3(k), 52.7(a). It lacks proof of service on the Respondent(s) and the Real-Party- in-Interest, and it is not signed by the relator. See id. 9.1, 9.5, 52.2. Because of our disposition and to expedite it, we will implement Rule 2 and suspend these rules. Id. 2.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.