Estebanon Barnes and Sleshia Neal v. Eddie Yaklin Ford Lincoln Mercury, Ltd and Eddie Yaklin F/L/m, Ltd, D/B/A Trinity Acceptance
Estebanon Barnes and Sleshia Neal v. Eddie Yaklin Ford Lincoln Mercury, Ltd and Eddie Yaklin F/L/m, Ltd, D/B/A Trinity Acceptance
Opinion
NUMBER 13-11-00769-CV COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG ____________________________________________________________ ESTEBANON BARNES AND SLESHIA NEAL, Appellants, v. EDDIE YAKLIN FORD LINCOLN MERCURY, LTD AND EDDIE YAKLIN F/L/M/, LTD D/B/A TRINITY ACCEPTANCE, Appellees. ____________________________________________________________ On appeal from the 214th District Court of Nueces County, Texas. ____________________________________________________________ MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Benavides and Perkes Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam Appellants, Estebanon Barnes and Sleshia Neal, filed an appeal from a judgment entered by the 214th District Court of Nueces County, Texas, in cause number 2011-DCV-0138-F. Appellants have filed an unopposed motion to dismiss the appeal on grounds that the parties have resolved the issues in dispute. Appellants request that this Court dismiss the appeal.
The Court, having considered the documents on file and appellants’ motion to dismiss the appeal, is of the opinion that the motion should be granted. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a). Appellants’ motion to dismiss is granted, and the appeal is hereby DISMISSED. In accordance with the agreement of the parties, costs are taxed against the party incurring same. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(d) ("Absent agreement of the parties, the court will tax costs against the appellant."). Having dismissed the appeal at appellants’ request, no motion for rehearing will be entertained, and our mandate will issue forthwith.
PER CURIAM Delivered and filed the 18th day of October, 2012.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.