Marc Rosenthal and Rosenthal & Watson, P. C. v. Jim Solis D/B/A Law Office of Jim Solis

NUMBER 13-12-00316-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG ____________________________________________________________ MARC ROSENTHAL AND ROSENTHAL & WATSON, P. C., Appellants, v.

JIM SOLIS D/B/A LAW OFFICE OF JIM SOLIS, Appellee. ____________________________________________________________

On Appeal from the 138th District Court of Cameron County, Texas. ____________________________________________________________

MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Benavides and Perkes

Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam The appellants’ brief in the above cause was due on July 18, 2012. On August 14, 2012, the Clerk of the Court notified appellants that the brief had not been timely filed and that the appeal was subject to dismissal for want of prosecution under Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 38.8(a)(1), unless within ten days from the date of receipt of this letter, appellants reasonably explained the failure and the appellee was not significantly injured by the appellants’ failure to timely file a brief. To date, no response has been received from appellants.

Appellants have failed to either reasonably explain their failure to file a brief, file a motion for extension of time to file their brief, or file their brief. Accordingly, the appeal is DISMISSED FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(a), 42.3(b).

PER CURIAM Delivered and filed the 4th day of October, 2012.