Raymond Trent Peterek v. State
Opinion
NUMBER 13-12-00332-CV
COURT OF APPEALS
THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG ____________________________________________________________ SAN JACINTO TITLE SERVICES OF
RIO GRANDE VALLEY, LLC, APPELLANT, v.
POCO MAS, LTD AND POCO MAS GRANDE, LTD., APPELLEES. ____________________________________________________________ On appeal from the 92nd District Court of Hidalgo County, Texas. ____________________________________________________________ MEMORANDUM OPINION
Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Garza and Vela Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam
The parties to this appeal have filed a joint motion to dismiss pursuant to settlement. The parties request this Court enter judgment vacating the trial court’s judgment and dismissing the cause with prejudice. The Court has considered the motion and it is the Court=s opinion that the motion should be GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART.1 Accordingly, without regard to the merits, we VACATE the judgment as to appellant, San Jacinto Title Services of Rio Grande Valley, LLC2, and REMAND the case to the trial court for rendition of judgment in accordance with the parties= settlement agreement. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a)(2)(B); 43.2(d). In accordance with the agreement of the parties, costs are taxed against the party incurring same. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(d).
PER CURIAM Delivered and filed the
29th day of August, 2012.
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.