Court of Appeals of Texas, 2012

in Re Greyhound Lines, Inc.

in Re Greyhound Lines, Inc.
Court of Appeals of Texas · Decided February 23, 2012
in Re Greyhound Lines, Inc.

Opinion

NUMBER 13-12-00075-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI – EDINBURG

IN RE GREYHOUND LINES, INC.

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Chief Justice Valdez, Justice Garza, and Justice Vela Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam1

Relator, Greyhound Lines, Inc., has filed a petition for writ of mandamus in which it contends that respondent, the Honorable Migdalia Lopez, Presiding Judge of the 197th Judicial District Court of Cameron County, Texas, abused her discretion, leaving relator without an adequate appellate remedy, by denying relator’s Motion for Protection and Motion to Reconsider regarding a deposition noticed by real parties in interest. Real parties in interest are: Motor Coach Industries, Inc.; Motor Coach Industries Service Parts, Inc.; ArvinMeritor, Inc.; Daniel Campos, individually and as representative of the estate of Christina Lozano Campos; Maria L. Lozano; Anna B. Schermerhorn; Adriana L. Pruitt; Amalia F. Heather; and Daniel N. Campos.

Having reviewed and fully considered relator’s petition and responses filed by real parties in interest, this Court is of the opinion that relator has not shown itself entitled to the relief requested and that the petition should be denied. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a). Accordingly, relator’s petition for writ of mandamus is DENIED.

PER CURIAM

Delivered and filed the

23rd day of February, 2012.

1 See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(d) (“When denying [mandamus] relief, the court may hand down an opinion but is not required to do so.”).

Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.