in Re: Richard Bradley
in Re: Richard Bradley
Opinion
COURT OF APPEALS
EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
EL PASO, TEXAS
IN RE: RICHARD BRADLEY,
Relator. |
'
'
'
'
'
'
|
No. 08-12-00237-CR
AN ORIGINAL PROCEEDING
IN MANDAMUS
|
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Relator, Mr. Richard Bradley, has filed a pro se petition for writ of mandamus requesting that this Court order the Honorable Kenneth D. DeHart, Judge of the 394th District Court, to set aside Relator’s conviction in Cause No. 2672.
To obtain relief through a writ of mandamus, a relator must establish that no other adequate remedy at law is available and that the act he seeks to compel is ministerial. State ex rel. Young v. Sixth Judicial Dist. Court of Appeals at Texarkana, 236 S.W.3d 207, 210 (Tex.Crim.App. 2007). An act is ministerial if it does not involve the exercise of discretion. State ex rel. Hill v. Court of Appeals for the Fifth District, 34 S.W.3d 924, 927 (Tex.Crim.App. 2001). Based on the petition and record provided, Mr. Bradley has not demonstrated that he is entitled to mandamus relief. See Tex. R. App. P. 52.8. Accordingly, the petition is denied.
GUADALUPE RIVERA, Justice
July 31, 2012
Before McClure, C.J., Rivera, J., and Antcliff, J.
(Do Not Publish)
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.