Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, 2012

in Re: Harold W. Mitchell

in Re: Harold W. Mitchell
Court of Civil Appeals of Texas · Decided February 29, 2012

in Re: Harold W. Mitchell

Opinion

COURT OF APPEALS EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS EL PASO, TEXAS

§ No. 08-12-00021-CR IN RE: HAROLD W. MITCHELL, § ORIGINAL PROCEEDING RELATOR.

§ ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF § MANDAMUS

MEMORANDUM OPINION Relator Harold Mitchell, pro se, has filed a petition for writ of mandamus, requesting that this Court compel the Honorable Bill McCoy, judge of the 358th Judicial District Court of Ector County to withdraw that part of its judgment which ordered Relator to reimburse the state for attorney’s fees and costs related to his criminal conviction. Section 22.221 of the Texas Government Code expressly limits the mandamus jurisdiction of the courts of appeals to (1) a writ necessary to enforce the jurisdiction of the court, (2) a writ against a district court judge or county court judge in the court of appeals’ district, or (3) a writ against a judge of a district court who is acting as a magistrate at a court of inquiry in the court of appeals district. TEX.GOV’T CODE ANN. § 22.221(a), (b)(West 2004). Because the petition for writ of mandamus is not directed against a district court judge or county court judge in our district, and issuance of the writ is not necessary to enforce our jurisdiction, we do not have jurisdiction of this original proceeding. Accordingly, we dismiss the petition for writ of mandamus for want of jurisdiction.

February 29, 2012 CHRISTOPHER ANTCLIFF, Justice Before McClure, C.J., Rivera, and Antcliff, JJ. (Do Not Publish)

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.