Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, 2012

Roger Cecil Perry, Jr. A/K/A Rodger Cecil Perry, Jr. v. State

Roger Cecil Perry, Jr. A/K/A Rodger Cecil Perry, Jr. v. State
Court of Civil Appeals of Texas · Decided December 6, 2012

Roger Cecil Perry, Jr. A/K/A Rodger Cecil Perry, Jr. v. State

Opinion

02-12-416-CR


COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

 

 

 

 

NO. 02-12-00416-CR

 

 

Roger Cecil Perry, Jr. a/k/a Rodger Cecil Perry, Jr.

 

 

v.

 

 

 

The State of Texas

§

 

§

 

§

 

§

 

§

From the 371st District Court

 

of Tarrant County (0982309D)

 

December 6, 2012

 

Per Curiam

 

(nfp)

 

JUDGMENT

          This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that the appeal should be dismissed.  It is ordered that the appeal is dismissed.

 

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

 

 

PER CURIAM

 

 

 

 

 

 


COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

 

 

 

 

NO. 02-12-00416-CR

 

 

ROGER CECIL PERRY, JR. A/K/A RODGER CECIL PERRY, JR.

 

APPELLANT

                                                                                                                            

V.

 

THE STATE OF TEXAS

 

STATE

 

 

------------

 

FROM THE 371ST DISTRICT COURT OF TARRANT COUNTY

 

------------

 

MEMORANDUM OPINION[1]

 

------------

Appellant Roger Cecil Perry, Jr. a/k/a Rodger Cecil Perry, Jr. attempts to appeal from the trial court’s judgment adjudicating his guilt of aggravated robbery with a deadly weapon and sentencing him to eight years’ confinement pursuant to a plea agreement.  The trial court’s certification of his right to appeal states that this “is a plea-bargain case, and the defendant has NO right of appeal.”

On September 7, 2012, this court notified appellant about the statement on the trial court’s certification and informed him that unless he or any party desiring to continue to the appeal filed with the court, on or before September 17, 2012, a response showing grounds for continuing the appeal, the appeal could be dismissed.  See Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(d), 44.3.  We have received no response.  Therefore, we dismiss the appeal.  See Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(d), 43.2(f).

 

                                                                             PER CURIAM

 

 

PANEL:  MCCOY, MEIER, and GABRIEL, JJ.

 

DO NOT PUBLISH

Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b)

 

DELIVERED:  December 6, 2012



[1]See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.