Ronald Jones v. Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance Company Bank of America N. A. R. Dwayne Danner Kelly Orlando And Robert Mowery
Opinion
COURT OF APPEALS
SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS
FORT WORTH
NO. 02-11-00282-CV
RONALD JONES APPELLANT V.
MASSACHUSETTS MUTUAL LIFE APPELLEES INSURANCE COMPANY; BANK OF
AMERICA N. A.; R. DWAYNE
DANNER; KELLY ORLANDO; AND
ROBERT MOWERY
----------
FROM THE 153RD DISTRICT COURT OF TARRANT COUNTY ----------
MEMORANDUM OPINION1 ----------
On June 22, 2012, more than three months after appellant’s original noncompliant brief was filed and after we had offered appellant numerous opportunities to correct the deficiencies, we notified appellant that his amended brief had not been filed as required by Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 38.6(a). See Tex. R. App. P. 38.6(a). We stated that we could dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution unless appellant or any party desiring to continue this appeal filed with the court on or before July 2, 2012, a response showing grounds for continuing the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3. Appellant responded by filing a motion for extension to file his brief, which did not show grounds for continuing the appeal. The motion for extension is DENIED.
Because appellant’s brief has not been filed, we dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(a), 42.3(b), 43.2(f).
Appellant shall pay all costs of this appeal, for which let execution issue.
PER CURIAM PANEL: WALKER, MCCOY, and MEIER, JJ.
DELIVERED: August 16, 2012
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.