Brittany Aiken v. State
Brittany Aiken v. State
Opinion
COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH NO. 02-11-508-CR BRITTANY AIKEN APPELLANT V. THE STATE OF TEXAS STATE ------------ FROM THE 367TH DISTRICT COURT OF DENTON COUNTY ------------ MEMORANDUM OPINION1 AND JUDGMENT ---------- We have considered appellant’s “Motion To Dismiss Appeal.” Although appellant has not signed the motion in compliance with rule 42.2(a) of the rules of appellate procedure, appellant indicated in writing in a letter received in this court on April 12, 2012, that she no longer wishes to pursue her appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.2(a). We suspend rule 42.2(a)’s requirement that appellant sign the motion to dismiss the appeal. Id.; see Tex. R. App. P. 2. No decision of this court having been delivered before we received this motion, we grant the motion and dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 43.2(f).
See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.
PER CURIAM PANEL: MEIER, J.; LIVINGSTON, C.J.; and GABRIEL, J.
DO NOT PUBLISH Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b) DELIVERED: April 26, 2012
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.