Brittany Aiken v. State
Brittany Aiken v. State
Opinion
COURT OF APPEALS
SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS
FORT WORTH
NO. 02-11-508-CR
BRITTANY AIKEN APPELLANT V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS STATE ------------
FROM THE 367TH DISTRICT COURT OF DENTON COUNTY ------------
MEMORANDUM OPINION1 AND JUDGMENT ----------
We have considered appellant’s “Motion To Dismiss Appeal.” Although appellant has not signed the motion in compliance with rule 42.2(a) of the rules of appellate procedure, appellant indicated in writing in a letter received in this court on April 12, 2012, that she no longer wishes to pursue her appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.2(a). We suspend rule 42.2(a)’s requirement that appellant sign the motion to dismiss the appeal. Id.; see Tex. R. App. P. 2. No decision of this court having been delivered before we received this motion, we grant the motion and dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 43.2(f).
PER CURIAM
PANEL: MEIER, J.; LIVINGSTON, C.J.; and GABRIEL, J.
DO NOT PUBLISH
Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b)
DELIVERED: April 26, 2012
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.