Court of Appeals of Texas, 2012

Joe Reece v. Citimortgage, Inc.

Joe Reece v. Citimortgage, Inc.
Court of Appeals of Texas · Decided March 22, 2012
Joe Reece v. Citimortgage, Inc.

Opinion

COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02-11-00343-CV

JOE REECE APPELLANT V.

CITIMORTGAGE, INC. APPELLEE

------------

FROM COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 1 OF TARRANT COUNTY ------------

MEMORANDUM OPINION1 AND JUDGMENT ------------

On February 27, 2012, we notified appellant that his brief had not been filed as required by Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 38.6(a). See Tex. R. App. P. 38.6(a). We stated we could dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution unless appellant or any party desiring to continue this appeal filed with the court within ten days a response showing grounds for continuing the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3. We have not received any response.

Because appellant's brief has not been filed, we dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(a), 42.3(b), 43.2(f).

Appellant shall pay all costs of this appeal, for which let execution issue.

PER CURIAM PANEL: MEIER, J.; LIVINGSTON, C.J.; and GABRIEL, J.

DELIVERED: March 22, 2012

1 See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.

Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.