William Mayo v. Technical Transportation

COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02-11-00331-CV

WILLIAM MAYO APPELLANT V.

TECHNICAL TRANSPORTATION APPELLEE

------------

FROM THE 352ND DISTRICT COURT OF TARRANT COUNTY ------------

MEMORANDUM OPINION1 AND JUDGMENT ------------

We have considered the parties’ “Agreed Motion For Remand.” The motion is GRANTED. We set aside, without regard to the merits, the trial court=s judgment and remand this case to the trial court for further proceedings in accordance with the parties’ agreement. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a)(2)(B); Innovative Office Sys., Inc. v. Johnson, 911 S.W. 2d 387, 388 (Tex. 1995); In re Ortega, 225 S.W.3d 610, 610–11 (Tex. App.––El Paso 2006, no pet.).

Costs of the appeal shall be paid by the party incurring the same, for which let execution issue. See Tex. R. App. P. 43.4.

PER CURIAM PANEL: DAUPHINOT, GARDNER, and WALKER, JJ.

DELIVERED: March 15, 2012