Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, 2012

Jack Speer, Individually and D/B/A S&R Electric, Inc. v. Crescent Electric Supply Company

Jack Speer, Individually and D/B/A S&R Electric, Inc. v. Crescent Electric Supply Company
Court of Civil Appeals of Texas · Decided February 23, 2012

Jack Speer, Individually and D/B/A S&R Electric, Inc. v. Crescent Electric Supply Company

Opinion

COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH NO. 02-11-00497-CV

JACK SPEER, INDIVIDUALLY AND APPELLANT D/B/A S&R ELECTRIC, INC. V. CRESCENT ELECTRIC SUPPLY APPELLEE COMPANY

------------ FROM COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 2 OF DENTON COUNTY ------------ MEMORANDUM OPINION1 AND JUDGMENT ------------ On January 30, 2012, we notified appellant that the trial court clerk responsible for preparing the record in this appeal had informed the court that payment arrangements had not been made for the clerk’s record as required by Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 35.3(a)(2). See Tex. R. App. P. 35.3(a)(2).

We stated that we would dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution unless See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4. appellant, within fifteen days, made arrangements to pay for the clerk’s record and provided this court with proof of payment.

Because appellant has not made payment arrangements for the clerk’s record, it is the opinion of the court that the appeal should be dismissed for want of prosecution. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 37.3(b), 42.3(b).

Appellant shall pay all costs of the appeal, for which let execution issue.

PER CURIAM PANEL: WALKER, MCCOY, and MEIER, JJ.

DELIVERED: February 23, 2012

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.