Nancy Simenstad v. R. Keith Spencer and Bailey & Galyen
Nancy Simenstad v. R. Keith Spencer and Bailey & Galyen
Nancy Simenstad v. R. Keith Spencer and Bailey & Galyen
Opinion
COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH NO. 02-11-00491-CV
NANCY SIMENSTAD APPELLANT V. R. KEITH SPENCER AND BAILEY & APPELLEES GALYEN
------------ FROM THE 352ND DISTRICT COURT OF TARRANT COUNTY ------------ MEMORANDUM OPINION1 AND JUDGMENT ------------ We have considered appellant’s “Motion To Dismiss.” It is the court=s opinion that the motion should be granted; therefore, we dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a)(1), 43.2(f).
Costs of the appeal shall be paid by appellant, for which let execution issue. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(d).
PER CURIAM PANEL: DAUPHINOT, GARDNER, and WALKER, JJ.
See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.
DELIVERED: January 19, 2012
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.