COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH NO. 02-11-00328-CR

LORENZO WILSON APPELLANT V. THE STATE OF TEXAS STATE

---------- FROM THE 432ND DISTRICT COURT OF TARRANT COUNTY ---------- MEMORANDUM OPINION1 ---------- Appellant Lorenzo Wilson entered an open plea of guilty to sexual assault of a child under seventeen years of age. See Tex. Penal Code Ann. § 22.011(a)(2) (West 2011). After accepting his guilty plea, the trial court deferred sentencing until a presentence investigation report could be prepared.

After a sentencing hearing, the trial court sentenced Wilson to ten years’ confinement.

See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.

Wilson’s court-appointed appellate counsel has filed a motion to withdraw as counsel and a brief in support of that motion. Counsel’s brief and motion meet the requirements of Anders v. California2 by presenting a professional evaluation of the record demonstrating why there are no arguable grounds for relief. This court afforded Wilson the opportunity to file a brief on his own behalf, but he did not do so. As the reviewing court, we must conduct an independent evaluation of the record to determine whether counsel is correct in determining that the appeal is frivolous. See Stafford v. State, 813 S.W.2d 503, 511 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991); Mays v. State, 904 S.W.2d 920, 923 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth 1995, no pet.). Only then may we grant counsel’s motion to withdraw. See Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 82–83, 109 S. Ct. 346, 351 (1988).

We have carefully reviewed the record and counsel’s brief. We agree with counsel that this appeal is wholly frivolous and without merit; we find nothing in the record that arguably might support an appeal. See Bledsoe v. State, 178 S.W.3d 824, 827–28 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005). Accordingly, we grant counsel’s motion to withdraw and affirm the trial court’s judgment.

SUE WALKER JUSTICE

386 U.S. 738, 87 S. Ct. 1396 (1967).

PANEL: LIVINGSTON, C.J.; WALKER and GABRIEL, JJ.

DO NOT PUBLISH Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b) DELIVERED: January 19, 2012