COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH NO. 02-11-00547-CR

DONALD RAY CAGLE APPELLANT V. THE STATE OF TEXAS STATE

---------- FROM THE 432ND DISTRICT COURT OF TARRANT COUNTY ---------- MEMORANDUM OPINION1 ----------

On October 19, 2011, as part of a plea bargain agreement, Appellant Donald Ray Cagle pleaded guilty to felony driving while intoxicated and true to a felony repetition enhancement allegation; and the trial court sentenced him to fifteen years’ confinement. On October 19, 2011, the trial court also certified that this is a plea bargain case and that Appellant has no right to appeal. On October

See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.

27, 2011, Appellant filed a document with the trial court that we have construed as a notice of appeal. He then filed an amended notice of appeal on December 5, 2011. The trial court’s certification that Appellant has no right to appeal was filed in this court on December 8, 2011. On December 9, 2011, we notified Appellant that the certification indicating that Appellant had no right to appeal had been filed in this court, and that this appeal could be dismissed unless Appellant or any party desiring to continue the appeal filed a response showing grounds for continuing the appeal on or before December 19, 2011. See Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(d), 44.3. Appellant has timely filed a response; however, the response does not show any grounds for continuing the appeal.

Rule 25.2(a)(2) limits the right of appeal in a plea-bargain case to matters that were raised by written motion filed and ruled on before trial or to cases in which the appellant obtained the trial court’s permission to appeal. Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(a)(2). Appellant does not challenge a pretrial ruling on a written motion, and the trial court’s certification denied permission to appeal. Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(d), 43.2(f).

PER CURIAM PANEL: GABRIEL, J.; LIVINGSTON, C.J.; and DAUPHINOT, J.

DO NOT PUBLISH Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b) DELIVERED: January 12, 2012