Writ of Mandamus 1)enied. Opinion issued December 10, 21)12

In The rnitrt rif i\ppra1 Fift1! 3itrirt nf LrxLu tt Ja11n No. 05-12-01419-CV

IN RE L. WAYNE TUCKER, ELIZABETH GEORGE, AND THE F & M BANK AND TRUST COMPANY, Relators

Original Proceeding from the 162nd Judicial District Court I)allas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. I)C—12-06-036

MEMORANDUM OPINION Betbre Justices Moseley, FitzGerald, and Myers Opinion by Justice Moseley Relators contend the trial judge erred in authorizing depositions to he taken under Rule 202 of the Texas Rules of Civil Procedure. The facts and issues are well known to the parties, so we need not recount them herein. Based on the record before us, we conclude relators have not shown they are entitled to the relief requested. See TEx. R. A1p. P. 52.8(a): Walker v. Packer, 827 S.W.2d 833, 839-40 (Tex. 1992) (orig, proceeding). Accordingly, we DENY relators’ petition for writ of mandamus. / / /

/ I /1 / /JIMMOSELBY / / JUSTICE 121419F.P05