Afllrmed; Opinion Filed November 28, 2012.

In The Qourt of ppeat Jftftlj itritt of exa at atta No. 05-11-00682-CR FRANK VASQUEZ, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellec On Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 7 Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. F11-33493-Y

MEMORANDUM OPF% ION Beibre Justices Moseley, Francis, and Lang Opinion by Justice Lang A jury convicted Frank Vasquez of theft valued less than $1,500 enhanced by two prior theft convictions and assessed punishment at ten years’ imprisonment and a $10,000 fine. On appeal, appellant’s attorney tiled a brief in which she concludes the appeal is wholly frivolous and without merit. The brief meets the requirements of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). The brief presents a professional evaluation of the record showing why, in effect, there are no arguable grounds to advance. See High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807, 811 (Tex. Crim. App. [Panel Op.] 1978). Counsel delivered a copy of the brief to appellant. We advised appellant of his right to file a pro se response, but he did not file a pro se response.

We have reviewed the record and counsel’s brief. See Bledsoe v. State. 178 S.W.3d 824, 827 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005) (explaining appellate court’s duty in Anders cases). We agree the appeal is frivolous and without merit We fmd nothing in the record that might arguably support the appeal.

We affirm the trial court’s judgment.

4 -.

crA 47/ i DOUGL4$IS. LANG JUSTLCW Do Not Publish TEx. it An. P.47 10682F.U05 QEourt of tppa1 jfiftlj itritt of Eexa at at1a JUDGMENT FRANK VASQUEZ, Appellant Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 7 of Dallas County, Texas (Tr.Ct.No. No. 05-I l-0O6i2-CR V. Fl l-33493-Y).

Opinion delivered by Justice Lang, Justices THE STATE OF TEXAS. Appellee Moseley and Francis participating.

Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, the trial court’s judgment is AFFIRMED.

Judgment entered November 28, 2012

— i eC LS.LANG/ JUSTiCE