AFFIRM; Opinion issued Noveniber 2S, 2012

In The QEourt of Z1ppeat jitftj Oitrict of Z!rexa at OaUa No. 05-1 2-00404-CR SHANTA VIA PATRICE BELL, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the Criminal District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. F12-13531-H MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Moseley, Francis. and Lang Opinion by Justice Francis Shantavia Patrice Bell waived a jury and pleaded guilty to attempted burglary of a habitation. The trial court assessed punishment at ten years in prison. On appeal, appellant’s attorney filed a brief in which she concludes the appeal is wholly frivolous and without merit.

The brief meets the requirements of Anders v. Califirnia, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). The brief presents a professional evaluation of the record showing why, in effect, there are no arguable grounds to advance. See High v. State. 573 S.W.2d 807. 811 (Tex. Crim. App. [Panel Op.] 1978). Counsel delivered a copy of the brief to appellant. We advised appellant of her right to file a pro se response, but she did not file a pro se response.

We have reviewed the record and counsels brie[ See B/edsoe v. State. 1 78 S. W.3d 824.

827 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005). We agree the appeal is frivolous and without merit. We find nothing in the record that might arguably support the appeal.

We afflrin the trial courts judgment.

—NI

MOLLY FRANIS JUSTICE

Do Not Publish TEx. R. APP. P. 47 I 20404F.U05 QEourt of Zipptat jf iftlj itrtct of ‘texa at afta JUDGMENT SHANTA VIA PATRICE BELL. Appeal from the Criminal District Court of Appellant Dallas County, Texas (Tr.Ct.No. Fl 2- 13531-H).

No. 05-12-00404-CR V. Opinion delivered by Justice Francis, Justices Moseley and Lang participating.

TIlE STATE OF TFXAS Appellee

Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, the trial court’s judgment is AFFIRMED.

Judgment entered November 28, 2012.

MOLLY IR\N IS it S ICE