Dismissed and Opinion FlIed November 27, 2012

In The Court of ppeaI% film trftt of 5exas at aI1a% No. 0542-00926-CR HERNAN FRA IRE, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the 283rd Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. Ft9-23600-T MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Bridges, O’Neill, and Murphy Opinion by Justice Murphy Heman Fraire pleaded guilty to aggravated robbery with a deadly weapon. On July 20, 2009, the trial court deferred adjudicating appellant’s guilt, placed him on ten years’ community supervision, and assessed a $3,000 fine. The State later moved to adjudicate appellant’s guilt On June 11,2012, the trial court adjudicated appellant guilty and sentenced him to fifteen years’ imprisonment. Appellant timely filed a motion for new trial and notice of appeal. The Court now has before it appellant’s motion to dismiss the appeal in which he states the trial court granted his motion for new trial, denied the State’s motion to adjudicate, and modified the conditions of his community supervision.

An order granting a motion for new trial restores a ease to its position heibre the tbrmer trial. See ILX, R. Ai. P. 21 9(b); WaIler i. State, 931 SW2d 640, 643—44 (Tex. App—Dallas 1996, no pet.), in this case, the trial court’s order granting the motion for new trial returned appellant’s case to its position beibre the trial court adjudicated him guilty. Thereafter, the trial court denied the motion to adjudicate guilt and modified the conditions of supervision. An order continuing an individual on community supervision is not an appealable order. See Baisaklua V.

State, 558 S.W.2d 2, 5 (Tex. (Tex. Crim. App. 1977). Therefore, we grant appellant’s motion to dismiss the appeal.

We dismiss the appeal for want ofjurisdiction.

RY -

.JUSTlC1J Do Not Publish Tix. R. App. P. 47 120926F.U05 Qiourt of 1ppcah if 11th Ottrirt of Z1Ixa at Oatta JUDGMENT HERNAN FR,r\IRE, Appellant Appeal from the 283rd Judicial District Court of Dallas County, Texas (Trial Court No. 0512M0926CR V. No. F09..23600—T), Opinion delivered by Justice Murphy, THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee Justices Bridges and O’Neill participating.

Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, we DISMISS the appeal Ir want of j tin sdi ction, Judgment entered November 27, 2012.

k MAR’i’ MU1PHY JUSTlCE