Worldwide Express Operations, LLC v. DHL Express (USA), Inc.

I)lSi1lSS; Opinion tiled Nov emher 16. 2012

In The (Cnurt uf Appit1Ei

Fift1! I1itrirt nf rxu tt Iatta6

No. 05-12-00048-CV WORLDVV IDE EXPRESS OPERAT1OS, LLC 1)/B/A WORLDWIDE EXPRESS, Appellant V. DilL EXPRESS (USA), INC., Appellee On Appeal from the 192nd JudiciaI District Court Dallas Connt’, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC-08-15314 MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Moseley, Francis, and Lang

Opinion By Justice Lang

Before the Court is the parties’ agreed motion to dismiss the appeal. The pa1ies inform the Court that they have settled their differences. Accordingly, we grant the parties’ motion and dismiss the appeal. See TEX. R. App. P. 42.1(a).

DOUGLAS S. LANG 120048F.P05 JUSTICE

Qiiitrt uf Appcahi

*iftI Utrirt nf rxa at Dat1a

JUDGMENT

\VORLDWI[)E EXPRESS OPERATIONS. Appeal from the I 92nd Judicial District Court LI C D113i \\‘ORLDWIDF L\PRLSS ol Dallas County, Texas. (Tr.Ct.No. DC-0$— Appellant I 5314).

Opinion delivered by Justice Lang, Justices No. 05-12-0004$-CV V. Moseley and Francis, participating. DIlL EXPRESS (USA), INC., Appellee

Based on the Coui-t’s opinion of this date, the appeal is L)ISMISS1I). It is ORI)EREI) that the parties bear their own costs of the appeal.

Judgment entered November 16, 2012.

[)O UG LAS S. LANG JUSTICE