Affirmed; Opinion Filed November 16, 2012.

In The (!øiirt 01 Fift1! 1iitrirt of rxai tt Dillai No. 05-11-00897-CR

ESTE BAN ASTRAN, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 363rd Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. F09-72624-W

MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Moseley, Fillmore, and Myers Opinion By Justice Moseley Esteban Astran waived a jury and pleaded guilty to indecency with a child. See TEx. PEN\L CODE ANN. § 21 .11(a) (West 2011). The trial court assessed punishment at ten years’ imprisonment.

On appeal, appellant’s attorney filed a brief in which he concludes the appeal is wholly fiivolous and without merit. The brief meets the requirements of Anders v. cali/àrnia, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). The brief presents a professional evaluation of the record showing why, in effect, there are no arguable grounds to advance. See High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807, 811 (Tex. Crim. App. [Panel Op.] 1978).

Counsel delivered a copy of the brief to appellant.

Appellant filed a pro se response raising several issues. A court of appeals is not required to address the meiits ol claims raised in a pro se response. .See Bk’dsoc’ i’. .St(lt(’. I 7$ S.W.3d $24. $27 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005) (explaining appellate courts duty in Anders cases). Rather, the Court’s duty is to determine whether there are any arguable issues. and, if so. to remand the case to the trial court so that new counsel may be appointed to address those issues. ía’.

After reviewing counsel’s brief, appellant’s pro se response, and the record, we agree the appeal is frivolous and without merit. We find nothing in the record that might arguably support the appeal.

We affirm the trial court’s judgment.

/ /.1 /

f( J tM.MOS E LEY JUS’IiCE Do Not Publish TEx. R.. App. P. 47 10897F.U05 tutrt uf AT1izt1 FiftIi Jitrict uf t!ixa at Ja11a JUDGMENT ESTEBAN ASTRAN, Appellant Appeal from the 363rd Judicial District Court of Dallas County, Texas. (TrCtNo.

No. 05-1 l-00X97-CR V. F09-72624-W).

Opinion delivered by Justice Moseley’, THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee Justices Fillmore and Myers participating.

Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, the judgment of the trial court is AFFiRMED.

Judgmcnt enteicd Nocmbcr 16 2012

J1MMOSELEY / JUSTICE