in Re: Kernell Thaw
in Re: Kernell Thaw
Opinion
Writ of Manthunus l)enied, Opinion issued Noieniber 6, 2012
In 11w Ititirt nf Apicats .*iftl! Oi31riet of .!.tXu; 11 Ja1hu No, 05-12-01490-CV IN RE KERNELL THAW, Relator Original Proceeding from the list .jlI(licial District Court l)allas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC-12-094834
MEMORANDUM OPINION Belore Justices Bridges. Lang. and Fillmore Opinion by Justice Fillmore Relator contends the trial judge thiled to hold a hearing on her motion for temporary injunction. The facts and issues are well known to the parties, so we need not recount them herein.
Based on the record before us. we conclude relator has not shown she is entitled to the relief requested. See TEX. R. A. P. 52.8(a): Wufker v. Pucker. 827 S.W.2d 833, 839-40 (Tex. 1992) (orig. proceeding). Accordingly, we DENY relator’s petition for writ of mandamus.
—Th
ROBFRT M. FILlMORE 121490F .P05 JLSilCE
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.