in Re: Aftermath, Inc.

Vri( of Mandamus Denied, Opinion issued November 6, 2012 in The uitrt uf ;piah iftI! Thitrirt uf xa at 1alla No. 05-12-01426-CV

IN RE AFTERMATh, INC., Relator

Original Proceeding from the 68th Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 12-04971

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Befi)re Justices Moseley, FitzGerald, and Myers Opinion by Justice Myers Relator contends the trial judge erred by granting real parties in interest’s motion to compel. The facts and issues are well known to the parties, so we need not recount them herein. We conclude relator’s petition does not satisfy the requirements of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure. See TEx. R. App. P. 52.3(j); In re Butler, 270 S.W.3d 757, 758 (Tex. App.— Dallas 2008, orig. proceeding). Accordingly, we DENY relator’s petition for writ of mandamus.

LANA JUSTICE l426F.P05