Brooks, Bill v. McDonald, Mary
Brooks, Bill v. McDonald, Mary
Opinion
Dismissed Opinion issued November 6. 2012
In The (!nurt tif A11at! fiftI! tIitrirt uf Lrxai it t1a11wi No. 05-I 2-00265-C BILL BROOKS, Appellant V. MARY MCDONALD, Appellee
On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. I Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. CC-11-08551-A
MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Moseley, Fillmore, and rVlyers On February 20, 2012, appellant tiled a notice of appeal in this case. On October 8, 2012, appellee filed a motion to dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. On October 19, 2012, we ordered appellant to respond to the motion to dismiss within ten (lays. Appellant has not responded or otherwise communicated with this Court regarding his appeal.
Accordingly, we GRANT appel lee’s October 8, 2012 motion and DISMISS this appeal. See TEx. R. App. P. 38.8(a)(l).
PER CURIAM
120265F.P05 (!tiiirt iif ptah .Fift1i Jiitriri nf xw it Ozi11zu JUDGMENT BILL BROOKS, Appellant Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 1 of Dallas County, Texas, (Tr.Ct.No. CC-il No. 05- 12-00265-CV 0855 I-A).
Oiinion delivered per curiam before Justices MARY MCDONALD, Appellee Moseley, Fillmore, and Myers.
Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, this appeal is DiSMISSED. Appellee is ORDERED to recover her costs of this appeal from appellant.
Judgment entered November 6, 2012.
LANA MYERS .1 U ST ICE
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.