AFFIRM; Opinion issued October 30, 2012

In The Q!nurt nf Appia1z 3iift1i Iitrict nf !Jixaz at aftu No. 05-12-00023-CR .JEREMY JACK PRITCHARD, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the 439th Judicial District Court Rockwall County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2-10-482 MEMORANDUM OPINiON Before Justices Bridges. Richter, and Lang Opinion By Justice Bridges Jeremy Jack Pritchard appeals from the adjudication of his guilt for indecency with a child by contact. See TEx. PENAL CODE ANN. § 2 1.11(a) (West 2011). The trial court assessed punishment at ten years’ imprisonment. On appeal, appellant’s attorney filed a brief in which he concludes the appeal is wholly frivolous and without merit. The brief meets the requirements of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). The brief presents a professional evaluation of the record showing why, in effect, there are no arguable grounds to advance. See ffigh v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807, 811 (Tex. Crim. App. [Panel Op.] 1978). Counsel delivered a copy of the brief to appellant. We advised appellant of his right to file a pro se response, but he did not file a pro se response.

We have reviewed the record and counsels brief. See Bledsoe v. Slaie 178 S.W.3d 824.

827 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005) (explaining appellate court’s duty in Anders cases). We agree the appeal is frivolous and without merit. We find nothing in the record that might arguably support the appeal.

We affirm the trial court’s judgment

6:c t DAVID L. BRIDGES ‘<4 JUSTiCE Do Not Publish TEx. it An. P.47 I 20023F.U05

-2- Qlourt of 1ppa1 I ittj itrtct of Z1tcxa at a1ta JUDGMENT JEREMY JACK PRITCHARD. Appellant Appeal from the 439th Judicial District Court of Rockwall County, Texas No. 05-1 2-00023-CR V (Tr.Ct.No. 2-10-482).

Opinion delivered by Justices Bridges. ii IE STATE. OF TEXAS. Appellee Justices Richter and Lang participating.

I3ased on the Court’s opinion of this date. the trial court’s judgment is AFFIRMED.

Judgment entered October 30, 2012.

/ /• DAVID L. BRIDGES JUSTICE