Court of Appeals of Texas, 2012

Exco Operating Company. v. Tauren Exploration, Inc. and Cubic Energy, Inc

Exco Operating Company. v. Tauren Exploration, Inc. and Cubic Energy, Inc
Court of Appeals of Texas · Decided October 29, 2012
Exco Operating Company. v. Tauren Exploration, Inc. and Cubic Energy, Inc

Opinion

DISMISS; Opinion flIed October 29, 2012

In The Iturt tif \ppcaIs

FiftI! OtEtrtct uf xa at at1a

No. 05-12-01192-CV

EXCO OPERATING COMPANY, LP AND

BG US PRODUCTION COMPANY, LLC, Appellants V.

TAUREN EXPLORATION, INC. AND CUBIC ENERGY, INC., Appellees

On Appeal from the 298th Judicial District Court I)allas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC-l1-12425

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Bridges, Richter, and Lang Opinion By Justice Bridges

Before the Court is appellants’ unopposed motion to dismiss the appeal. Appellants inform the Court that the parties have settled their differences. Accordingly. we GRANT appellants’ motion and I)ISMISS the appeal. See TEx. R. App. P. 42.1(a)(1).

I DAVID L. BRIDGES JUSTICE

121 192F.P05

(Lunri uf Appcahi FiftI! iitrirt nf rxa at Ji11wi JUDGMENT

EXC() OPERATING COMPANY. LP AND Appeal from the 298th Judicial District Court BG US PRODUCTION COMPANY. LLC, of Dallas County. Texas. (Tr.Ct.No. DC-l 1- Appellants 12425).

Opinion delivered by Justice Bridges. Justices NC). 05-12-01 192-CV V. Richter and Lang. participating. lAUREN EXPL(.)RATION. INC. AND CUBIC ENERGY. INC., Appellees

Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, the appeal is DISMISSED. It is ORDERED that the parties bear their own costs of the appeal.

Judgment entered October 29, 2012.

DAVIDL. BRIDGES JUSTICE

Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.