Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, 2012

Benito, Rigoberto v. State

Benito, Rigoberto v. State
Court of Civil Appeals of Texas · Decided October 22, 2012

Benito, Rigoberto v. State

Opinion

Order ezitered October , 2012

In The Qtourt of Ztppeat fiftlj itrict of exa at atta No. 05-12-00375-CR Ri GOB ERTO BENITO, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appcllee On Appeal from the 401st .Judicial District Court Collin County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 401-81659-09 ORDER The Court ORDERS the trial court to conduct a hearing to determine why appellant’s brief has not been filed. In this regard, the trial court shall make appropriate findings and recommendations and determine whether appellant desires to prosecute the appeal, whether appellant is indigent, or if not indigent, whether retained counsel has abandoned the appeal. See TEx. R. App. P. 38.8(b). If the trial court cannot obtain appellant’s presence at the hearing, the trial court shall conduct the hearing in appellant’s absence. See Meza v, State, 742 S.W.2d 708 (Tex. App.—Corpus Christi 1 987, no pet.) (per curiam). If appellant is indigent, the trial court is ORDERED to take such measures as may be necessary to assure effective representation, which may include appointment of new counsel.

We ORDER the trial court to transmit a record of the proceedings, which shall include written lindings and recommendations, to this Court within THIRTY DAYS of the date of this order.

This appeal is ABATED to allow the trial court to comply with the above order. The appeal shall be reinstated thirty days from the date of this order or when the findings are received, whichever is earlier.

_/ /7

DAVID L. BRIDGES >- JUSTICE

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.