AFFIRM; Opinion Filed Octoher . 2012.

In The Qmirt nf ppat Fifth iatrict nf iIxLu at 1a11a No. 05-10-00524-CR No 05-10-00525-CR

KAREEN’I LEJON MARTIN, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 265th Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Con rt Cause Nos. F07-72788-R, F07-72789-R

MEMORANDUM OPINION Betbre Justices Moseley, Fillmore. and Myers Opinion By Justice Moseley A jury convicted Kareem Lejon Martin of two aggravated kidnapping offenses and assessed punishment at twenty years’ imprisonment in each case. On appeal, appella nt’s attorney filed a brief in which she concludes the appeals are wholly frivolous and without merit. The brief meets the requirements of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). The brief presents a professional evaluation of the record showing why, in effect, there are no arguable grounds to advance. See High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807, 811 (Tex. Crim. App. [Panel Op.] 1978). Counsel delivered a copy of the brief to appellant. We advised appellant of his right to file a pro se respon se, but he did not file a pro se response.

We have reviewed the record and counsel’s brief . See Bledsoc vState, 178 S.W.3d 824. 827 (Fex. Crim. App. 2005) (explaining appellate court’s duty in Anders cases). We agree the appeals are frivolous and without merit. We find nothing in the record that might arguably support the appeals.

We affirm the trial Court’s judgments.

/ / / / I; Ii P / / / ‘‘1 I / , / /4 1 / / .4/ JIM 6SELEY JV1CE / Do Not Publish VEX. R. Ape. p. 47 00524F.U05 (!nurt nf Atah 3fiftli Ohitrict uf ixai at JaI1as JUDGMENT KAREEM LEJON MARTIN, Appellant Appeal from the 265th Judicial District Court of Dallas County, Texas. (Tr.Ct.No. No. 05-10-00524-CR V F07- 7278 8-R).

Opinion delivered by Justice Moseley, THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee Justices Fillmore and Myers participating.

Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, the judgment of the trial court is AFFIR1VIED.

Judgment entered October 9, 2012.

I Li JIM MOSELEY J-IJSTICE