Ringo Drilling I, L.P. v. Victory Drilling, Inc.

I)ISN1 ISS: Opinion flied October 2. 2012

In The uf 41I1ra1l QLfl11t

FiftIj 1itrirt nf tixai at a11a

No. 054 2-00598CV RING() I)RILIJNG I, L.P., Appellant V. VICTORY DRILLING, INC., Appellee On Appeal from the 95th Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC-Ii-14896

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices O’Neill, FitzG erald,and Lang-Miers Opinion By Justice O’Neill

Before the Court is appellant’s motion to dismiss the appeal. Appellant informs the Court that the accelerated appeal is now moot. Accordingly, we grant appellant’s nyition and dismiss the appeal. See TEX. R. App. P. 42.! (a)( 1).

LLJILL JUSTICE /

1205 98F.P05

Q..L1IrL tL _\p’etk. fift1i Ji

Irirt tf Ltct t1 JaLIa; JUDGMENT

RING() I)RILl1NCi I, I..P .,Appellant Appeal from the 95th Judicial District Court of Dallas County, Texas. (Tr.Ct.No. DC-i I - No. O5-12-O5)8-CV V. 14896).

Opinion delivered by Justice O’Neill, Justices VICTORY DRILLING, INC., Appellee FitzGerald and Lang..Miers, participating.

Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, the appeal is I)JStiJISSEI).

It is ORDEREI) that appeilee, Victory Drilling, Inc., recover its costs of the appeal from appellant, Ringo Drillmz I L P J udgment entered October 2, 20! 2,