in Re: Holland, Rickey L., and Karen

Writ of Mandamus Denied, Opinion issued September 28, 2012

E o

In The nnrt uf ppiah FiftI! Ditrtrt uf icxa at Ja1Ias No. 05-12-01 185-CV

IN RE RICKEY L. HOLLAND AND KAREN HOLLAND, Relators

Original Proceeding from the 44th Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC-09-15867-B

MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Bridges, Lang, and Fillmore Opinion by Justice Bridges Relators contend the trial court erred in denying their motion to recuse. The facts and issues are well known to the parties, so we need not recount them herein. Based on the record before us, we conclude relators have not shown they are entitled to the relief requested. See TEx. R. App. 52.8(a); Walker v. Packer, 827 S.W.2d 833, 839-40 (Tex. 1992) (orig. proceeding). Accordingly, we DENY relators’ petition for writ of mandamus and emergency motion for temporary relief.

DAVID L. BRflS JUSTICE 185F.P05