Gomez, Daniel v. Thunderbird Apartments

DISMISS; Opinion filed August 31, 2012

In The

(Court of Apprats giftIiElistrirt of üJrxai at Dallas No. 05-10-01260-CV DANIEL GOMEZ, Appellant

V.

THUNDERBIRD APARTMENTS, Appellee On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 3 Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. CC-10-03922-C MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Chief Justice Wright and Justices Francis and Lang-Miers

Opinion By Chief Justice Wright By letter dated March 26, 2012, the Court informed appellant that his brief was past due. We directed appellant to file a brief with an extension motion within ten days and cautioned him that failure to do so would result in dismissal of his appeal.

As of today's date, appellant has not filed a brief. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(a)(1) & 42.3(b).

101260F.P05

Tourt uiAppeats iriftll

7 District of 0. .exas at Dallas JUDGMENT

DANIEL GOMEZ, Appellant Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 3 of Dallas County, Texas. (Tr.Ct.No. CC-10- No. 05-10-01260-CV V. 03922-C).

Opinion delivered by Chief Justice Wright, THUNDERBIRD APARTMENTS, Appellee Justices Francis and Lang-Miers, participating.

Based on the Court's opinion of this date, the appeal is DISMISSED. It is ORDERED that appellee, Thunderbird Apartments, recover its costs of the appeal from appellant, Daniel Gomez.

Judgment entered August 31, 2012.