Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, 2012

Kay Motor Company-Houston, Inc. v. 15625 Ft Bend Ltd. Dba Mercedes-Benz of Sugarland

Kay Motor Company-Houston, Inc. v. 15625 Ft Bend Ltd. Dba Mercedes-Benz of Sugarland
Court of Civil Appeals of Texas · Decided April 12, 2012

Kay Motor Company-Houston, Inc. v. 15625 Ft Bend Ltd. Dba Mercedes-Benz of Sugarland

Opinion

Opinion issued April 12, 2012.

In The

Court of Appeals

For The

First District of Texas

————————————

NO. 01-11-01118-CV

———————————

KAY MOTOR COMPANY-HOUSTON, INC., Appellant

V.

15625 FT. BEND LTD. D/B/A MERCEDES-BENZ OF SUGARLAND, Appellee

 

 

On Appeal from the 400th District Court

Fort Bend County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 10DCV180616A

 

 

MEMORANDUM OPINION

          Appellant, Kay Motor Company-Houston, Inc., has neither established indigence nor paid all the required fees.  See Tex. R. App. P. 5 (requiring payment of fees in civil cases unless indigent), 20.1 (listing requirements for establishing indigence); see also Tex. Gov’t Code Ann. § 51.207 (Vernon Supp. 2011), § 51.941(a) (Vernon 2005), § 101.041 (Vernon Supp. 2011) (listing fees in court of appeals); Order Regarding Fees Charged in Civil Cases in the Supreme Court and the Courts of Appeals and Before the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation, Misc. Docket No. 07-9138 (Tex. Aug. 28, 2007), reprinted in Tex. R. App. P. app. A § B(1) (listing fees in court of appeals).  After being notified that this appeal was subject to dismissal, appellant did not respond.  See Tex. R. App. P. 5 (allowing enforcement of rule); 42.3(c) (allowing involuntary dismissal of case).

          We dismiss the appeal for nonpayment of all required fees. 

          We dismiss any pending motions as moot.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Chief Justice Radack and Justices Higley and Brown.

 

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.