Opinion issued March 22, 2012

In The

Court of Appeals

For The

First District of Texas

————————————

NO. 01-12-00222-CR

———————————

In re Deon Joseph Johnson, Relator

Original Proceeding on Petition for Writ of Mandamus

MEMORANDUM OPINION

          Relator, Deon Joseph Johnson, has filed a pro se petition for writ of mandamus.  Relator seeks the writ of mandamus to compel the trial court to rule on his “Motion to Enter Judgment and Sentence Nunc Pro Tunc.”[*] 

Relator’s petition is procedurally defective.  See, e.g., Tex. R. App. P. 9.5(a), (d), (e) (requiring proof that copies of documents presented to court for filing were served on all parties to proceeding); Tex. R. App. P. 52.3(a) (requiring that petition include complete list of parties and names and addresses of counsel); Tex. R. App. P. 52.3(b)–(f) (requiring that petition include table of contents, index of authorities, statement of case, statement of jurisdiction, and issues presented); Tex. R. App. P. 52.3(h) (requiring that petition include appropriate citations to authorities and appendix or record materials); Tex. R. App. P. 52.3(j) (requiring that relator certify he reviewed petition and concluded that every factual statement is supported by competent evidence included in appendix or record); Tex. R. App. P. 52.3(k) (requiring that appendix include certified or sworn copy of any document showing matter complained of); Tex. R. App. P. 52.7(requiring relator to file record with petition).

          Accordingly, we deny the petition for writ of mandamus.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Jennings, Massengale, and Huddle.

Do not publish.   Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b).